|
The following Bill was
passed in the U.S. Senate by a vote of 51 to 50 with Vice President Chaney
casting the deciding vote. Budget Accord Could Mean Payments
by Medicaid Recipients By ROBERT PEAR, NY Tines Published: December 20, 2005 The agreement between the
two chambers, approved on Monday by the House, incorporates many
recommendations from governors of both parties, who had sought new power to
rein in the soaring cost of Medicaid. In general, Medicaid would
not cover long-term care for any person with home equity of more than $500,000,
although a state could choose to set the ceiling at a higher level, up to
$750,000. Under the current law, a
reduction in a state's caseload leads to a reduction in its work requirements,
and administration officials said the number of welfare recipients had fallen
so far in some states that the federal law imposed no meaningful work
requirements. Republicans hailed the final
budget bill as evidence of their determination to rein in the automatic growth
of benefit programs. Representative Joe L. Barton, Republican of Texas, the
architect of the Medicaid provisions, said the higher co-payments were needed
to "encourage personal responsibility" among low-income people. Medicaid recipients can be
charged 10 percent of the cost of any item or service if their family incomes
were 100 percent to 150 percent of the federal poverty level, $12,830 to
$19,245 for a family of two. Recipients with incomes above that can be required
to pay 20 percent of the cost of any item or service. Total co-payments for all
people in a family cannot exceed 5 percent of family income. Senator Jeff Bingaman,
Democrat of New Mexico, said, "It's very disappointing that Congressional
leaders would decide to cut health care benefits and coverage to children,
while imposing a greater cost-sharing burden on the poor, disabled and elderly." AARP, the lobby for older
Americans, denounced the final agreement. "It protects the pharmaceutical
industry, the managed care industry and other providers at the expense of
low-income Medicaid beneficiaries and Medicare beneficiaries who will foot the
bill," said William D. Novelli, chief executive
of AARP. Lawrence E. Davidow of Suffolk County, N.Y., president of the National
Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, whose members advise older people and their
families, said, "I'm horrified and surprised that Congress would turn its
back on middle-class senior citizens who look to Medicaid as a safety net to
pay for long-term care." Under the agreement, Mr. Davidow
said, "it's more likely that people who need long-term care will lose
their homes and everything they have worked a lifetime to acquire, because
they'll have to use their assets to pay for nursing home care." The Bush administration
announced last month that it would cut fees paid to doctors treating Medicare
patients by 4.4 percent in 2006. It said the cut was required by a statutory
formula. Congress decided instead to freeze doctors'fees
next year. That would increase Medicare spending over the next five years by
$7.3 billion above the amounts expected under the current law, the budget
office said. Beneficiaries would pay some of the cost through higher premiums. Under the agreement, states
will not have to provide Medicaid recipients with all the services now required
by federal law, but can offer a more modest package of benefits resembling
commercial insurance. The agreement also gives states new authority to charge
co-payments as a way to discourage the use of high-cost drugs and the use of
hospital emergency rooms for nonemergency care. House Republican aides said
they meant to preserve one of the most important Medicaid benefits, known as
"early and periodic screening, diagnostic and treatment services,"
for children younger than 19. The bill appears to be ambiguous on whether that
is an option or a requirement for states, but Senate Republicans said it was
intended to be a requirement. |